Today was the launch of the artefact project, which was pretty interesting. My first thought is I didn’t properly know what an artefact was beforehand. I thought it could be any object with any kind of significance to someone but apparently the word is a lot more specific. An artefact must be fabricated by a human being, and it usually has some kind of cultural or historical significance.
I thought natural objects could be artefacts as well. Can an object become an artefact by just being displaced by a human being?
For the launch presentation the tutors showed us examples of design projects that take into consideration the previous narrative baggage and significance that the objects or ideas they applied to their product-making carried beforehand. I thought it was very interesting to see the different kinds of media where this thought process can be applied.
While not my favourite project from the presentation, I thought the Shakespeare’s Globe logo redesign by The Partners was very inspiring from a graphic design point of view: The narrative power of artefacts can be applied to graphic design, and an infinitely reproducible logo design, if well thought out and sensibly imagined, can carry just as much historical and cultural weight in its application as a physical object.
I was feeling pretty inspired to think about artefacts during the lecture so I started doodling some objects that I generally take interest to before even visiting the museum. I’ll post pictures of those soon.


















































